Books

With my PhD in English Literature at Edinburgh University about to begin, I will be reading lots of stuff this year. Do not expect weekly reviews, I do not read quickly. But I will share with you anything interesting I do read, whether it’s a novel that’s in vogue, or something from my course that I think is worth knowing that broadened my horizon. I’ll be reading a lot of things about transgender discourse, but hopefully, a lot of things which aren’t, as well.

The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein

Klein-Shock-Mogg

The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein

This may be one of the most important books on the 21st century state of the world, an analysis of the global socio-economics that makes sense of the chaos of post-9/11 Iraq, of the collapse of democracies of Latin America since the 1960s and 70s, and the democratic false dawns of Russia and South Africa since the 1990s. The Shock Doctrine's exposé of U.S.-driven disaster capitalism, from the period of the Cold War until now, spotlights the connections between cruel national narratives and the manipulations that helped create them for the benefit of particular U.S. stakeholders. Reading Naomi Klein's work in post-Brexit Britain, one senses this is less history book than a warning of what's to come.

Broadly, The Shock Doctrine focuses on the impact caused by the ideas of post-WWII U.S. economist Milton Friedman and the (in)famous Chicago School which he originated and inspired. Aided by statesmen like Henry Kissinger and Friedman acolytes like Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, the influence of Friedman's ideas have led to the economic orthodoxy that now dominates institutions like the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank – those gatekeepers of monetary funding for nations who receive support in return for stripping away protections and wealth-re-distribution mechanisms for its citizens. This orthodoxy has replaced Keynesian ideas of State-funded support with a new trinity of (1) privatization, (2), government deregulation, and (3) deep cuts to social spending. The effect is a massive growth in inequality in both the Global North and South, with the rich getting richer, and increasing numbers of everyone else getting poorer.

The Shock element happens, as Klein notes, because the removal of State-aided support is generally so unpopular with national populations. Only in circumstances of national trauma, such as after 9/11 or during Hurricane Katrina, can a programme be enacted by stealth, while a nation's collective consciousness recovers. In New Orleans, Hurricane Katrina saw the U.S. government replace state schools with voucher-based charter schools, to a degree considered impossible via democratic mandate. 9/11 similarly saw a new Homeland Security industry of mass surveillance, legalized torture, and private military institutions such as Bechtel, Halliburton, and Blackwater, replace public ones. As Klein says, In just a few years, the homeland security industry, which barely existed before 9/11, has exploded to a size that is now significantly larger than either Hollywood or the music business . . . Although the stated goal was fighting terrorism, the effect was the creation of the disaster capitalism complex – a full-fledged new economy in homeland security, privatized war and disaster reconstruction tasked with nothing less than building and running a privatized security state, both at home and abroad.

We are, for example, well-versed in the supposed mediocrity of George W. Bush, but his radicalism is based on making Texas the beacon for privatized prison systems, part of what Klein describes as the hollowing out of national democracies, of democracies functioning in name only, while private organizations make huge profits for their CEOs and shareholders in their place – often with the support of public money and the funded politicians who enable it. The result is inscrutable CEOs colluding with national politicians and statesmen to ensure national policies that enrich these stakeholders at the cost of their general populations. The Iraq war is arguably the most tangible example of a cause fabricated by certain statesmen, costing America billions of dollars in contracts to particular companies with close links to the politicians who ignited it: Dick Cheney of Halliburton, James Baker of the Carlyle Group, Richard Perle of Boeing and Donald Rumsfeld of Lockheed and Gilead Sciences. The clash of interests is undeniable; the freedom for Iraqis meanwhile was always illusory. The U.S. Presidential Envoy in Iraq, Paul Bremer, blocked democratic elections after the fall of Saddam Hussein when polls indicated the Iraqi population wanted greater government-based job-creation, with little interest in the development of the private sector. Bremer in response hand-picked members of an Iraqi Government Council to oversee the mass privatization of the Iraqi state, which in turn contributed to resistance movements as jobs were cut in their hundreds of thousands under the edict of this foreign, occupying power.

It is with the recurrence of these policies of disaster capitalism, of removing tariffs and stripping populations of the state-legislated protections, which brings me to today, and the UK, and Brexit. Some weeks ago, I watched Jacob Rees-Mogg promote the idea of removing all tariffs, a post-Brexit act that would flood the UK with potentially cheap imports while inevitably undercutting British manufacturing to a degree that potentially replicates what happened in Chile after 1973 – when their economy imploded under the Milton-Friedman-advised dictator General Pinochet. Allied to Theresa May's vision of the UK as a tax-haven – of minimal wealth re-distribution and minimal protections for its population – it reiterates and re-imagines past countries who required brutal wars or dictatorships to enact the severe withdrawal of social support mechanisms. Why would so many British citizens vote for this future, as intended by these ghosts of Milton Friedman, elite conservative politicians like Rees-Mogg and May, as well as Farage? Does it highlight how we remain in a post-2008 state of shock? Is Britain, as a post-Thatcher country, already so damaged by the ideas of Milton Friedman as to have reached rock-bottom, at least for substantial parts of its population? Brexiters were right to want to take back control – many Remainers would agree with this aspiration. But the real control isn't wielded by the E.U., as Klein's book emphasizes, but by those forces operating within a hollowed-out democracy, where the 1980s deregulation of housing and job markets, and the receding of wealth re-distribution started. What Naomi Klein's The Shock Doctrine implies is that the worst may be yet to come, if Brexit occurs and more shock treatment is prescribed by doctors Mogg and May, Johnson and Gove, Redwood and Farage, for the benefit of a few and the suffering of many.

Freshwater by Akwaeke Emezi
Queer Two-Spirit Poetry: Fabian Romero
 

Comments

No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Guest
Friday, 04 December 2020

Captcha Image

What's On This Week

My Latest Posts

November 17, 2020

If I were to detransition, this is what I would write

Warning: this is a speculative piece of writing, not an official announcement, although I have recently begun to imagine an 'ideological' detransition (from trans woman to GNC male). Here, I'm trying to articulate and reflect on my thoughts and feelings, and imagining myself from a different perspective. In this post, I'm Gina v...
November 17, 2020

Trans Hell-thcare

The picture accompanying this post is important to me. I took it yesterday, 16 November 2020, unsure what I'd find. It's been nearly eleven months since I came off oestrogen for reasons I'll get into in a moment. Undoubtedly this has had an effect on me, bodily and therefore psychologically, but the accompanying selfie gives me a reassura...
October 17, 2020

What if gender-critical feminism came to power?

This scenario is inspired by a dialogue I had yesterday evening with a gender-critical feminist just before I went to bed. Here is what I dreamed: In the summer of 2021, the Conservative minister Liz Truss introduces legislation, making women-only spaces legally accessible only to those born female. This U.K. law includes a provision for funding al...
October 13, 2020

Responses to my blog post (1)

A frustrating aspect of my website is that when people write in, there's no trace of an email address so no way of getting back to people, and also no way of publishing their messages. However, I received such a nice response to my article just now that I'd like to include it here. It's from some who for the sake of confidentiality (in case it's ne...
October 11, 2020

On adopting a more gender-critical transgender activism

On adopting a more gender-critical transgender activism Note to the reader: This post is intended as a contribution to addressing the current tensions between transgender activism and gender-critical feminism. The way I see myself in relation to female i dentity, and the ideas I express here, are not a prescription for other trans women. The t...
May 11, 2020

The Book of Queer Prophets, curated by Ruth Hunt

in Books

  The Book of Queer Prophets: 24 Writers on Sexuality and Religion The historically fraught relationship between Abrahamic religions and LGBT+ identities provides the backdrop to The Book of Queer Prophets , a collection of twenty-four meditations by public figures who identify as both religious and LGBT+. The book's curator, the for...
May 09, 2020

Queer/Transgender short film: Mesmeralda

Joshua Matteo's short film, Mesmeralda , merging horror with esoterica, is now out on youtube . As with his previous work Metanoia , we see youthful trans actors racing through the empty streets of a moonlit New York, haunted by symbols and stalked by a masked figure of violent intentions. Mesmeralda , as described by Matteo, is the companion ...
March 08, 2020

Sterile like the moon: the joys of transgender healthcare

Sterile like the moon: the joys of transgender healthcare Summer, 2016: Gina's Big Bang, as transitioning begins A bureaucratic question in a sun-lit room. My medical practitioner asks me if I intend to have children. The question lingers, but the self-loathing is instant. No, I won't be having children. The practitioner nods. She moves on to the n...
November 10, 2019

General Election

General Election 12 December 2019 I spent the last election in an office, alone but for the company of a colleague. We watched the BBC's coverage while I drank wine, downbeat and expecting austerity and the absence of hope to triumph. Then we saw the exit poll and hung around, disbelieving at the sight of the kindled embers and lukewarm glow of a f...