Edinburgh Cinema

Edinburgh’s cinemas have their own, different feel. When I visit them, I’ll be writing about both the film and the place, giving you the organic experience. Film critics on the big scale can’t really cater for this, so I hope my reviews bring something extra in this respect.




A lukewarm reaction from critic Mark Kermode and a condemnation from political writer Simon Jenkins are a strange way to start this review of the Dick Cheney biopic Vice, given that I really enjoyed it. Jenkins's is peculiar, believing it reduced the U.S. invasion of Iraq to the work of a few shady men in the U.S. administration. But wasn't it? Weren't the reasons for the invasion of Iraq – Weapons of Mass Destruction – proven false? Didn't Dick Cheney's energy company Halliburton make ridiculous amounts of money from the invasion? More broadly, wasn't the U.S.'s reaction to 9/11 a textbook example of the Shock Doctrine: of exploiting a national disaster to implement extreme (right-wing) policies that might otherwise never be given the light of day? How else could the invasion of Iraq have been justified, and for that matter, the erosion of people's rights regarding surveillance and torture? For Jenkins, the events after 9/11 might appear like so much chaos; more perceptive writers like Naomi Klein have made convincing arguments it was anything but.

Yet all the questions raised in the film do point to its biggest flaw. Vice is an often brilliantly acerbic and surreal view of Dick Cheney's rise from drunken failure to one of the most powerful men in the world. The rogue's gallery of Cheney, George W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Colin Powell is engagingly hilarious, with Steve Carell's Rumsfeld funnily obnoxious, and Sam Rockwell's Bush on the nose. But what drives these men beyond their lack of sympathy for the consequences of their actions isn't clear, ideologically. Compare, for example, the other film made by the producers of this film, The Big Short, which explores the events that directly cause the 2008 Global Crash. There, we get an attempt at understanding the cause-and-effect. Vice, however, is much less articulate or focused on why the actions of Dick Cheney and the Bush administration proved so popular with the American public, and indeed, with the likes of British PM, Tony Blair. The presentation of Cheney and Rumsfeld as cynical white men is believable but not enough, given the impact and damage they caused.

Connected to this superficiality is one of the biggest missed opportunities, the marginal representation of Condoleeza Rice, who made perhaps two short utterances in the entire film. Other characters perhaps deserved minor parts – Colin Powell is rightly depicted as a political lightweight, while Paul Wolfowitz always seemed to me greasily two-dimensional even in real life. Not so Condoleeza Rice, arguably the most academically brilliant member of the Bush administration, as well as the most visibly genuine. A deeper exploration of Rice's experience might have added welcome dimensions to this film, balancing the privileged-white-bloke dynamics with alternative insights into why lying to your country to start a war is so laudable an exercise. For similar reasons, the performance by Amy Adams of Dick Cheney's wife Lynne is a highlight of the film – to some degree, the Lady Macbeth to her husband's drunken, loser version of Macbeth. But apart from her valuing of power, we see little of her beliefs. If Lynne Cheney was so forceful a power behind one of the most ideological (and powerful) Vice-Presidents in U.S. history, then what was her connection to this ultimately discredited concept called Neoconservative? Ultimately, Vice is a film less about ideas than about events and some of the shady characters involved. I welcome its endeavour and found it attractively watchable, but for depth and understanding of my generation's equivalent of the Vietnam War, my generation needs this kind of film to be just the tip of the iceberg.

Alita: Battle Angel
The Favourite


No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment
Wednesday, 14 April 2021

Captcha Image

What's On This Week

My Latest Posts

December 22, 2020

Lacanian Icarus: when Gina flew too close to the sun?

On the recent experience of nearly being no-platformed There are two identities in one when it comes to being part of a disempowered minority. The first is for yourself: all your failings, your insecurities, your doubts, and connected to this, your curiosity and quirks. Let's be Lacanian analysts for a moment: what we're talking about is the transg...
November 17, 2020

If I were to detransition, this is what I would write

Warning: this is a speculative piece of writing, not an official announcement, although I have recently begun to imagine an 'ideological' detransition (from trans woman to GNC male). Here, I'm trying to articulate and reflect on my thoughts and feelings, and imagining myself from a different perspective. In this post, I'm Gina v...
November 17, 2020

Trans Hell-thcare

The picture accompanying this post is important to me. I took it yesterday, 16 November 2020, unsure what I'd find. It's been nearly eleven months since I came off oestrogen for reasons I'll get into in a moment. Undoubtedly this has had an effect on me, bodily and therefore psychologically, but the accompanying selfie gives me a reassura...
October 17, 2020

What if gender-critical feminism came to power?

This scenario is inspired by a dialogue I had yesterday evening with a gender-critical feminist just before I went to bed. Here is what I dreamed: In the summer of 2021, the Conservative minister Liz Truss introduces legislation, making women-only spaces legally accessible only to those born female. This U.K. law includes a provision for funding al...
October 13, 2020

Responses to my blog post (1)

A frustrating aspect of my website is that when people write in, there's no trace of an email address so no way of getting back to people, and also no way of publishing their messages. However, I received such a nice response to my article just now that I'd like to include it here. It's from some who for the sake of confidentiality (in case it's ne...
October 11, 2020

On adopting a more gender-critical transgender activism

On adopting a more gender-critical transgender activism Note to the reader: This post is intended as a contribution to addressing the current tensions between transgender activism and gender-critical feminism. The way I see myself in relation to female i dentity, and the ideas I express here, are not a prescription for other trans women. The t...
May 11, 2020

The Book of Queer Prophets, curated by Ruth Hunt

in Books

  The Book of Queer Prophets: 24 Writers on Sexuality and Religion The historically fraught relationship between Abrahamic religions and LGBT+ identities provides the backdrop to The Book of Queer Prophets , a collection of twenty-four meditations by public figures who identify as both religious and LGBT+. The book's curator, the for...
May 09, 2020

Queer/Transgender short film: Mesmeralda

Joshua Matteo's short film, Mesmeralda , merging horror with esoterica, is now out on youtube . As with his previous work Metanoia , we see youthful trans actors racing through the empty streets of a moonlit New York, haunted by symbols and stalked by a masked figure of violent intentions. Mesmeralda , as described by Matteo, is the companion ...
March 08, 2020

Sterile like the moon: the joys of transgender healthcare

Sterile like the moon: the joys of transgender healthcare Summer, 2016: Gina's Big Bang, as transitioning begins A bureaucratic question in a sun-lit room. My medical practitioner asks me if I intend to have children. The question lingers, but the self-loathing is instant. No, I won't be having children. The practitioner nods. She moves on to the n...